Thursday, September 7, 2017

Reformism: The Affordable Care Act of 2010



"Healthcare is not a privilege. It's a right. It's a right as fundamental as civil rights. It's a right as fundamental as giving every child a chance to get a public education."
- Rod Blagojevich

"You can't stand for full human equality in all hings and then say that health insurance is not a birth right. Frankly, the thought of health insurance is actually an insult. It is medical care under all and any circumstances that should be guaranteed from birth." - Kent Allen Halliburton 

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, often shortened to the Affordable Care Act, or nicknamed Obamacare, is a United States federal statute enacted by the 111th United States Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. The term "Obamacare" was first used by opponents, then reappropriated by supporters, and eventually used by President Obama himself. Together with the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act amendment, it represents the U.S. healthcare system's most significant regulatory overhaul and expansion of coverage since the passage of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965.

The ACA's major provisions came into force in 2014. By 2016, the uninsured share of the population had roughly halved, with estimates ranging from 20–24 million additional people covered during 2016. The increased coverage was due, roughly equally, to an expansion of Medicaid eligibility and to major changes to individual insurance markets. Both involved new spending, funded through a combination of new taxes and cuts to Medicare provider rates and Medicare Advantage. Several Congressional Budget Office reports said that overall these provisions reduced the budget deficit, and that repealing the ACA would increase the deficit. The law also enacted a host of delivery system reforms intended to constrain healthcare costs and improve quality. After the law went into effect, increases in overall healthcare spending slowed, including premiums for employer-based insurance plans.

The act largely retains the existing structure of Medicare, Medicaid, and the employer market, but individual markets were radically overhauled around a three-legged scheme. Insurers in these markets are made to accept all applicants and charge the same rates regardless of pre-existing conditions or sex. To combat resultant adverse selection, the act mandates that individuals buy insurance and insurers cover a list of "essential health benefits." To help households between 100–400 percent of the Federal Poverty Line afford these compulsory policies, the law provides insurance premium subsidies. Other individual market changes include health marketplaces and risk adjustment programs.

The act has also faced challenges and opposition. In 2009, Senator Ted Kennedy died, and the resultant special election cost the Democrats their 60 seat filibuster-proof Senate majority before the ACA had been fully passed by Congress. The Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 in 2012 that states could choose not to participate in the ACA's Medicaid expansion, although it upheld the law as a whole. The federal health exchange, HealthCare.gov, initially faced major technical problems during its rollout in 2013. In 2017, a unified Republican government tried to pass several different partial repeals of the ACA. The law spent several years opposed by a slim plurality of Americans polled, although its provisions were more popular than the law as a whole, and the law gained plurality support by 2017.

How Does this Relate to Reformism?

This is actually kind of brief. First, it gives corporations in certain areas of the nation the ability, based on adverse market conditions, to withdraw from the market. So, basically, Smalltown, USA is screwed in the local market. Second, as is known, this law can penalize the people for not having insurance, but what many do not know, is that the law does provide for an option where they can enter their income in and if they make below a certain amount for the region, their fee will get waived. So, for once second, reformism works for the common man. Finally, unfortunately, there are still some states refusing to fully participate in the program, at least not completely. On a final note, at least, and luckily, the bill has, thus far, withstood the test of time.

2 comments:

  1. Person A has no right to what person B has earned through his or her own work.

    To assert that "health care" is a "human right" stipulates that person A has a right to have a third party, person or group C, work on his or her behalf to forcefully extort person B of what person B has earned, and person A did not earn - then reward the fruits of that armed robbery to person A.

    In criminal law: Person or group C is an extortionist, armed robber or racketeer - person A is a criminal conspirator or accomplish and person B is a victim.

    Why?

    Because "Person A has no right to what person B has earned through his or her own work."

    ReplyDelete
  2. No one should have to choose whether or not they can afford to live or die.

    ReplyDelete